Shift in the Post-covid Bureaucratic Paradigm. World map

-

● There was a major shift noticed in the mid-covid19 outbreak. The shift was political in nature but the result affected the bureaucratic and diplomatic relations between all the rising superpowers.
You have heard about the rising threat of another world war. We all have encountered such news . While China was busy developing a more sophisticated and efficient infrastructure. The other superpowers were busy putting blame on each other. The ignorant behavior of China lead it to be the last country standing to put the blame on. Diplomacy says that if you can't have control on something, then control yourself. China was busy developing a better place to treat the rising amount of patients. While others were busy blaming. Day by day, everyday the cases were increasing and China was busy building special hospitals for all covid-19 patients. 
The bureaucratic failure was first seen at United Nations, when Chinese ambassador failed to warn about this threat to all members. Or we can say that they delayed to warn. This was the only reason considered by all nations, which lead to covid pandemic. But when we think of it, in India the first case of covid came from abroad and the second and the third too. That time, no one cared as much as they should have. Rather putting blame, first we have to think about the root cause of covid spread. The time has arrived now that China has become the most hated nation by himself. The unilateralism of USA in the United Nations has also put a sort of pressure on other member nations to marginalise China from any sort of international support.
As we talk about China's ideological brother Russia and it's side, the outcome will hurt you too. Russia is a big supporter of China and it got his fair reasons to. China is a land full of resources. The population is a problem until you see them as consumers. So Russia kept silent on this topic. Maybe it was thinking of a more exiting thing, the cancellation of all presidential elections until Putin was President. Yes, it was a bigger surprise for both the land of liberty and the land of Putin. As India already said "no alignment" to both the superpowers, it remained silent. Being the largest democratic state, India becomes silent on every such matters. But I think India had it's own surprises planned. 
Continued in next post.......

Comments

Post a Comment

THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE I WAS PLEASED TO ENTERTAIN YOU!

Popular posts from this blog

Political Realism(classical) in India

-
Image
  International relations and it's specialist accept that there are difference in ideas and theories of different states which UN have to grapple with. Political Realism stresses that international politics has a competitive and conflicted history, but all of them were dealt with moral, ideal and liberal modes. The only motive behind the moral nature of realism in international politics is to build a co-operative environment. Where the superpowers are in an arms tussle, the concept of realism is proved to be more efficient in diplomatic talks and treaty. Every rising superpower is trying to ensure security of their people, act of persuading their own national interest and struggling to be in a powerful positions in every treaty organization. The only negative part of being realists' is that they only motivated toward achieving their own interests. Interest is often their suspicion in the relevance of moral and ethical standards towards relationship between the stat
Read more

Contemporary and comparative government and politics(modern approaches)

-
Image
  Discuss the modern approaches of comparative government and politics:- When we say that a particular theory is a result of comparative government and politics, then we mean that theory is a result to a comparative study of different political system and there working. According to Wikipedia, it is a field in political science characterized either by the use of the comparative method or other empirical methods to explore politics within countries. This includes the questioning or analysing the working of political institutions, political behaviours, conflicts, and the causes and consequences of economic development of different nation and under different types of governments. The term modern approach is simply used to determine the time of the emergence of a particular theory. The comparative study is supplemented or supported by some methodological approach; modern approach is one of such method of defining the time and idea. Normative methods generally refers to the
Read more

Deliberative Democracy

-
Image
Deliberative democracy, is undoubtedly a better way to govern a state. In my research as a whole, I did not find even a single state which strictly follows deliberative democratic governing body. Deliberative democracy theory states that there should be a deliberative and co-operative form of government. The government should completely follow the rule of discussion with all elite members before taking a huge step. A routine check should be kept on the processes so that no single opinion goes waste. The center most idea should be deliberative decision-making. It means that both consensus decision-making and majority rule  is seen in a combination and full co-operation. Deliberative democracy was never as par with the traditional democratic theory, because it merely believed in voting. Let's learn more about it. It originated from the ideas of Aristotle and his notions of politics. However, Joseph M. Bessette was the first thinker to put all the links together in his 198
Read more