Pollution a threat

-

 How pollution has become not only an environmental but also a political threat. It was long ago, when we see the effect of pollution on environment. Now we can see that the political environment is also becoming vulnerable to the increasing threat of pollution. Now, where did my notion of political effect came from, I say the presidential elections of United States of America. When Biden, a candidate for upcoming election, talked about Trump's policies related to environmental pollution. We remember when a girl, came on the roads asking questions to the government about taking responsibility of environment. My question is where is she, what is she doing right now and if we don't know anything then why. Was all that protests was for no reason at all? Or she attained the publicity that she wanted. Whatsoever, I think what she did is that she woke up those people who stopped thinking about pollution. As the present president says that there is no such thing as pollution present in America. It is because the government is making their own measuring scales. See if the government itself decides the level of pollution that is safe so that they don't have to face embarrassment in national forum. 

According to Biden, Trump's policy is to don't take any responsibility of the wildfires that took place in the past. Whereas Trump's satat that there is no threat such as climate change. If you put some pressure on your memory, you will surely recall the Indian P.M. Modi said that environment doesn't changes rather we change. His idea was about the growing age leading to feel more cold and hot. Rather climate change is a long term effect of pollution. This message was seen as a responsible explanation of change in the climate by the media and news all over the nation. My point is that both Trump and Modi did accept that climate changes but either because of god or is an after effect of growing old. Avoiding such questions is an attempt to murder or act of ignoring the aftermath effect of it on our upcoming generation. If such thing happens then who should be blamed to bring harm to the nation?

To be continued...

By- Baibhav Ranjan  | BA UNIVERSITY OF DELHI

Comments

Post a Comment

THANK YOU FOR YOUR RESPONSE I WAS PLEASED TO ENTERTAIN YOU!

Popular posts from this blog

Political Realism(classical) in India

-
Image
  International relations and it's specialist accept that there are difference in ideas and theories of different states which UN have to grapple with. Political Realism stresses that international politics has a competitive and conflicted history, but all of them were dealt with moral, ideal and liberal modes. The only motive behind the moral nature of realism in international politics is to build a co-operative environment. Where the superpowers are in an arms tussle, the concept of realism is proved to be more efficient in diplomatic talks and treaty. Every rising superpower is trying to ensure security of their people, act of persuading their own national interest and struggling to be in a powerful positions in every treaty organization. The only negative part of being realists' is that they only motivated toward achieving their own interests. Interest is often their suspicion in the relevance of moral and ethical standards towards relationship between the stat
Read more

Contemporary and comparative government and politics(modern approaches)

-
Image
  Discuss the modern approaches of comparative government and politics:- When we say that a particular theory is a result of comparative government and politics, then we mean that theory is a result to a comparative study of different political system and there working. According to Wikipedia, it is a field in political science characterized either by the use of the comparative method or other empirical methods to explore politics within countries. This includes the questioning or analysing the working of political institutions, political behaviours, conflicts, and the causes and consequences of economic development of different nation and under different types of governments. The term modern approach is simply used to determine the time of the emergence of a particular theory. The comparative study is supplemented or supported by some methodological approach; modern approach is one of such method of defining the time and idea. Normative methods generally refers to the
Read more

Deliberative Democracy

-
Image
Deliberative democracy, is undoubtedly a better way to govern a state. In my research as a whole, I did not find even a single state which strictly follows deliberative democratic governing body. Deliberative democracy theory states that there should be a deliberative and co-operative form of government. The government should completely follow the rule of discussion with all elite members before taking a huge step. A routine check should be kept on the processes so that no single opinion goes waste. The center most idea should be deliberative decision-making. It means that both consensus decision-making and majority rule  is seen in a combination and full co-operation. Deliberative democracy was never as par with the traditional democratic theory, because it merely believed in voting. Let's learn more about it. It originated from the ideas of Aristotle and his notions of politics. However, Joseph M. Bessette was the first thinker to put all the links together in his 198
Read more